Russwurm Social Russwurm Social
  • Login
subscribe: @laurelrusswurm@s.russwurm.org @larryrusswurm@s.russwurm.org @lynnrusswurm@s.russwurm.org
  • Public

    • Public
    • Groups
    • Recent tags
    • Popular
    • Directory

Conversation

Notices

  1. laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Self Publishing

    What You Need to Know About Hachette vs Amazon https://www.change.org/petitions/hachette-stop-fighting-low-prices-and-fair-wages !selfpub

    Friday, 15-Aug-14 21:46:10 EDT from web
    • simsa01 and quix0rquitter like this.
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm Cf. “Is Amazon Evil?” [Onnesha Roychoudhuri] http://bit.ly/1pmaU0q {A more factual piece from 2010 on Amazon]

      Saturday, 16-Aug-14 07:46:39 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm Cf “Is Amazon Evil?” (2010) [Onnesha Roychoudhuri] http://bit.ly/1pmaU0q {Amazon & market conditions of publishing industry]

      Saturday, 16-Aug-14 07:52:45 EDT
    • lnxw48 lnxw48 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm @simsa0 I haven’t read any of these links, but I am aware that #Amazon has similar disputes with several smaller publishing houses, so this could be a case of muscle-flexing to get preferential terms & prices.

      Saturday, 16-Aug-14 09:06:46 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm simsa01

      @simsa0 Factual? From just before the big 6 & apple were busted for collusion to price fix to inflate ebook prices?

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 02:03:32 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm lnxw48

      @lnxw48 I’ve been researching to blog about this, which makes me doubt that. The big 5 (nee 6) are big because they have consumed…

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 02:08:14 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm lnxw48

      @lnxw48 ...other publishers. They each have masses of small imprints that used to be small publishers but are now imprints (divisions)

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 02:09:58 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm simsa01

      @simsa0 Tho not a fan of Amazon, given a choice between it & Big 5 I would take Amazon b/c it makes it possible for authors to be indies

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 02:15:43 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm simsa01

      @simsa0 I certainly don’t want #Amazon to be a monopoly but there ARE other sources like #KOBO #Smashwords #TUEBL #ProjectGutenberg

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 02:23:58 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm lnxw48

      This is the experience of a real small publishing house http://www.thecockeyedpessimist.blogspot.ca/2014/05/whos-afraid-of-amazoncom.html

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 02:26:51 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm simsa01

      Lagardère’s Investor Presentation (mother company of Hachette) http://www.thepassivevoice.com/06/2014/lagarderes-investor-presentation/

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 02:31:43 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm simsa01

      @simsa0 This is what led me to the Lagardère post http://www.hughhowey.com/hachettes-slides-to-investors/

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 02:33:02 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm As reader I don’t use ebooks from Amazon has I don’t own them & Amazon may delete all my “subscriptions” w/o warning >

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 05:34:48 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm > cf. e.g. http://bit.ly/VvcaTl http://bit.ly/1rg9EyM For authors: How the royalties by Amazon compare to trad. publishers >

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 05:46:13 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm > I can’t say, it’S tiny in both worlds I suppose, regardless how much promotion you do on your own. (Don’t know if this >

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 05:47:03 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm > http://bit.ly/1lbcByv is still a valid point, if it ever was).

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 05:50:04 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm Even if you don’t want it to be, Amazon is the monopoly, in that it exerts power like the Big 5. And sorry: I prefer well >

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 05:51:40 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm > crafted books (well written, well designed, wel produced), so Project Gutenberg gives me the creeps. But this is more >

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 05:53:33 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm > “content” & how it enters my reading eyes, not the topic of “freedom” you raised (as if there indeed were any in these >

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 05:55:52 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm > times of capitalist cholera). (I never read a novel via the screen of my computer b/c of my eyesight, nor on kindle.)

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 05:57:31 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm > crafted books (well written, well designed, well produced), so Project Gutenberg gives me the creeps. But this is more >

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 05:59:21 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm > about “content” & how it enters my reading eyes, not the topic of “freedom” you raised (as if there indeed were any in >

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 05:59:59 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm > about “content” & how it enters my reading eyes then the topic of “freedom” you raised (as if there indeed were any in >

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 06:02:28 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm > these times of capitalist cholera).

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 06:03:32 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm Thx for all the links, I’ll red them later. Now off to work at the scullery of the restaurant.

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 06:05:06 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm > about “content” & how it enters my reading eyes than the topic of “freedom” you raised (as if there were ndeed any in >

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 06:07:34 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm > about “content” & how it enters my reading eye than the topic of “freedom” you raised (as if there were indeed any in >

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 06:08:15 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm > these times of capitalist cholera).

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 06:08:37 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm Thx for all the links, I’ll read them later. Now off to work at the scullery of the restaurant.

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 06:09:15 EDT
    • boneidol boneidol

      Cory Doctorow wrote about this recently in the context of DRM http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jun/20/how-amazon-holding-hachette-hostage

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 06:12:03 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm Well, I can’t judge this, but there are reports that Amazon pays out the worst > http://is.gd/3P0Sc2

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 06:58:08 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm “For every $9.99 book I sell I, the author, pay 30% to Amazon for the right to sell on Amazon AND $2.58 for them to >

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 06:59:23 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm > deliver the DIGITAL GOOD to your device. It is free for the reader, but the author, not amazon, pays for delivery.”

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 06:59:47 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm boneidol

      @boneidol Yup, DRM is one of the things Amazon does I dislike, but I can sell my book without it, Hachette books could be #DRMfree too.

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 12:32:21 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm boneidol

      @boneidol Some famous writers are trying to rally public opinion against Amazon to artificially inflate the price of eBooks.

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 12:37:58 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm boneidol

      @boneidol The authors claim Amazon discriminates against them by not providing the stellar service they got under the expired contract.

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 12:42:42 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm boneidol

      @boneidol The chief complaint is authors are being economically hurt, yet Amazon has offered 3 ways to compensate ignored by Hachette

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 12:48:31 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm boneidol

      @boneidol I’ve read complaints of ordinary Hachette authors unhappy with Hachette & the superstar authors lobbying against Amazon

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 12:50:36 EDT
    • lnxw48 lnxw48

      Didn’t #Lulu have a little spat with #Amazon a few years back? That’s when I first started noticing publisher after publisher battling their biggest distributor.

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 12:52:23 EDT
    • lnxw48 lnxw48

      @laurelrusswurm The publishing business tends to be anti-competitive, but #Amazon is very close to being a monopoly (which carries special obligations to prevent abuse of monopoly position). By almost all accounts, Amazon is not carrying out those obligations.

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 12:54:22 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm simsa01

      @simsa0 Read the “buyers remorse” comment at the top of the comments. This is not Amazon’s deal with self publishers.

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 12:55:58 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm simsa01

      @simsa0 That may change if Amazon becomes a monopoly. It doesn’t have to…readers should support #KOBO and other etailers & #DRMfree

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 12:58:57 EDT
      lnxw48 likes this.
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Everything about books , simsa01

      @simsa0 It irritates me to have to support Amazon, but if I’m right this is part 2 of !ebook #pricefixing saga and bad for !books

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 13:02:46 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm simsa01

      @simsa0 I don’t either. People who buy my book through #Amazon get a #DRMfree !eBook that can be format shifted & backed up anywhere

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 13:17:07 EDT
      lnxw48 likes this.
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm lnxw48

      @lnxw48 No, by the accounts of the mainstream media. Like mainstream publishing, it is unhappy with disruption of its business model.

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 15:47:00 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm lnxw48

      @lnxw48 Amazon and Hachette’s contract has been expired I think as long ago as January. It very much appears the sticking point is…

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 15:48:38 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm lnxw48

      @lnxw48 ...ebook prices, which #Amazon wants to be $9.99 and #Hachette wants to be $19.99 to prop up paperback sales.

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 15:50:28 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm lnxw48

      @lnxw48 I don’t know. Presumably when Amazon acquired #CreateSpace and started competing with #LuLu directly. Up until then I think…

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 15:54:09 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Self Publishing , lnxw48

      @lnxw48 ... #LuLu required !selfpub authors 2 pay a lot up front (vanity press) 4 POD books. Now LuLu charges per book like CreateSpace.

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 15:57:07 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm lnxw48

      @lnxw48 no one is more concerned than I am about the prospect of an Amazon monopoly, but Hachette reassures me we are not there yet.

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 15:58:42 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm lnxw48

      @lnxw48 The “AuthorsUnited” authors who imply they represent all authors and stand against preventing book sales from being blocked…

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 16:00:30 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm lnxw48

      @lnxw48 ...say nothing about the fact that self publishing authors POD books are blocked from sale in brick&mortar bookstores.

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 16:01:52 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Self Publishing , lnxw48

      @lnxw48 Before the Internet it was impossible for most authors to make a living with a Big 6 contract, and !selfPub was nonexistent

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 16:04:40 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Self Publishing , lnxw48

      @lnxw48 well over 8,000 !selfPub authors, indies & readers signed http://ur1.ca/hzd20 in fear of return to big5 publishing oligopoly

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 16:13:27 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm lnxw48

      @lnxw48 If the complaining authors have no contract with Amazon I don’t understand how they can blame Amazon for not giving them perks…

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 16:17:21 EDT
      quix0rquitter likes this.
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm lnxw48

      @lnxw48 ...to which they were entitled under a contract. Amazon continues to sell their books without a contract in force.

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 16:35:14 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm lnxw48

      @lnxw48 Amazon has also offered 3 ways to make up for any economic loss Hachette authors incur during the dispute, which was declined.

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 16:37:02 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm lnxw48

      @lnxw48 I am under no illusion Amazon does this because it is nice, but it is good business not to have big name authors badmouthing it.

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 16:38:42 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm lnxw48

      @lnxw48 Hachette’s big authors want to be in the middle, so they can lobby; it is the little Hachette authors who wish Hachette accepted

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 16:43:47 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm lnxw48

      @lnxw48 Apparently Amazon did the same thing in a previous negotiation with a Big 5 Publisher.

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 16:44:34 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm Could you please be more specific about which comment you have in mind? Thx.

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 17:12:30 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm lnxw48

      @lnxw48 This is the guy who started the anti-Amazon letter/petition/ad https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100211/0222088129.shtml

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 18:24:07 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm simsa01

      @simsa0 This one: “Reading about the Amazon vs Big 6, Kindle vs Nook, ePublishing vs Legacy publishing. What I find distasteful about this article is that he has as
      bad case of buyers remorse I have ever seen. After reading this it took me less than 15 minutes to find Amazon’s pricing. He knew beforehand what the cost per book was. If he didn’t like the pricing he
      didn’t have to sign with them. If he had done his research properly in the beginning he could have chosen just to self publish. Instead he used Amazon’s platform then decided to scream that he had been taken when in fact he hadn’t. Then he used his hissy fit as a way to market his book and direct people to his self publish page. Good Marketing for him. but it leaves a bad taste. He could have gone straight to Nook or iBooks initially, but I feel that he planned his marketing strategy to take the ant-Amazon anti-Big Bad Wolf into consideration and then let
      the extremists do all the work for him. I don’t know anything about his book and at this point I don’t want to. His whining is more than enough to read.”

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 18:30:31 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Self Publishing , simsa01 , lnxw48

      @simsa0 @lnxw48 !selfPub is hard work,and being successful isn’t fast or guaranteed. The point is the option didn’t used to exist.

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 18:34:36 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm simsa01

      Paying for no cost delivery may seem onerous, but I think making readers pay $20 for a #DRMed !eBook is far far worse.

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 18:38:23 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm eBooks , simsa01

      Last I heard Libraries paid MORE than the cost of hardcover, and could only lend it one at a time for 1 year. #Big5 !eBooks #crazy

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 18:39:57 EDT
    • lnxw48 lnxw48 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm @simsa0 Makes sense. I think that’s about when I started hearing more about #Amazon‘s anti-competitive activities. (Although I’ve been hearing about them since at least 2006.) I certainly was not defending Hachette (never heard of them before the dispute went public).

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 18:41:27 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm Thx. I disagree w/ it: It’s not a simple “he didn’t have to sign up”. To reach a larger audience at all, he had to accept >

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 18:49:12 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm > a bad deal. Then the comment goes on suggesting that b/c the author didn’t have to accept the terms of the deal, he did >

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 18:51:52 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm > all along to badmouth Amazon for PR. Which I find to be a rather malignant insinuation.

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 18:52:29 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm Yep. I find the licensing-model taken from software (proper) rather harmful in book publishing. I keep buying paper books.

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 18:56:14 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm I won’t enter into that as I don’t know details. As reader I read paper books, as author I wouldn’t like to become a geek >

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 18:58:30 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm > first just to be able to publish a book at all. As I wouldn’t waste my time on self-marketing. So I my opinion authors >

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 18:59:33 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm > should simply stop hoping to earn money from their “content” or “creation” at all. As there is already too much text >

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 19:00:51 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm > competing for our attention, ppl should accept that there is no money to made in writing & publishing.

      Sunday, 17-Aug-14 19:01:34 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm simsa01

      @simsa0 I think its an accusation, but I find it credible. There are those who play upon prejudices to get what they want. And do.

      Monday, 18-Aug-14 00:19:02 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01 lnxw48

      @laurelrusswurm @lnxw48 Of course it did, even / esp. in the paper world. Remeber counter-public of the 60s – 90s? Point is: In those >

      Monday, 18-Aug-14 00:22:54 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01 lnxw48

      @laurelrusswurm @lnxw48 > times it wasn’t about the money but to get stuff out, to raise awareness, to enlighten ppl. Now those means, >

      Monday, 18-Aug-14 00:25:16 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01 lnxw48

      @laurelrusswurm @lnxw48 > electronically modified are used to make a buck, & ppl whine b/c they can’t make it quick & big.

      Monday, 18-Aug-14 00:26:24 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01 lnxw48

      @laurelrusswurm @lnxw48 Of course it did, even / esp. in the paper world. Remember counter-public of the 60s – 90s? Point is: In those >

      Monday, 18-Aug-14 00:27:25 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01 lnxw48

      @laurelrusswurm @lnxw48 > times it wasn’t about the money of but to get stuff out, to raise awareness, to enlighten ppl. Now those means, >

      Monday, 18-Aug-14 00:28:30 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01 lnxw48

      @laurelrusswurm @lnxw48 > electronically modified, are used primarily to make a buck, & ppl whine b/c they can’t make it quick & big.

      Monday, 18-Aug-14 00:29:36 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01 lnxw48

      @laurelrusswurm @lnxw48 > times it wasn’t about the money but to get stuff out, to raise awareness, to enlighten ppl. Now those means, >

      Monday, 18-Aug-14 00:32:06 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01 lnxw48

      @laurelrusswurm @lnxw48 > electronically modified, are used primarily to make a buck, & ppl whine b/c they can’t make it quick & big.

      Monday, 18-Aug-14 00:33:10 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm It’ll happen now & then, but in this specific case? I rather disagree.

      Monday, 18-Aug-14 00:34:42 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm simsa01

      @simsa0 Sure, it was possible to self publish pamphlets/newsletters/fanzines, but self published novels were dismissed as “vanity press”

      Monday, 18-Aug-14 00:42:16 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm simsa01

      @simsa0 based on what?

      Monday, 18-Aug-14 00:45:52 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm simsa01

      @simsa0 On the contrary, there is an obscene amount of money to be made from writing. Just trad publishers do their best to keep it all.

      Monday, 18-Aug-14 00:54:21 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm simsa01

      @simsa0 There are many reasons to write and publish. Fiction is as important as nonfiction; sometimes more.

      Monday, 18-Aug-14 01:05:21 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm simsa01

      @simsa0 The odd creator doesn’t want to share their work, but most want to reach an audience. Creation is communication.

      Monday, 18-Aug-14 01:07:43 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Self Publishing , simsa01

      @simsa0 In the beginning you did, but today you don’t have to be a geek to self publish; the tools are there. !selfPub

      Monday, 18-Aug-14 01:09:19 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm simsa01

      @simsa0 Selfpublishers can hire others to do the things they can’t. It’s much cheaper than entering the indentured servitude of tradpub

      Monday, 18-Aug-14 01:10:49 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm simsa01

      @simsa0 Self publishers who are not independently wealthy can crowd source funds thru services like #pubslush #indiegogo or #kickstarter

      Monday, 18-Aug-14 01:13:24 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm simsa01

      @simsa0 I rather think you get people who expect to make it big quick whining in all walks of life.

      Monday, 18-Aug-14 01:16:04 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm simsa01

      @simsa0 Writers want to make a living as writers, not bricklayers. If people are buying books why shouldn’t they?

      Monday, 18-Aug-14 01:18:25 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm simsa01

      @simsa0 I’s discourage anyone who becomes a writer to get rich; there are easier ways.

      Monday, 18-Aug-14 01:27:16 EDT
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Self Publishing , simsa01

      @simsa0 !Selfpub is viable today – authors can make a living because of it thanks to etailers like #KOBO and #Amazon

      Monday, 18-Aug-14 01:32:24 EDT
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @laurelrusswurm true as well.

      Monday, 18-Aug-14 08:17:52 EDT
    • bobjonkmanformer bobjonkmanformer

      What @Ubersoft News has to say about Hachette vs. Amazon https://www.eviscerati.org/comics/comic/hd/2014/08/Struggle-Between-Empires http://sn.jonkman.ca/attachment/18799

      Thursday, 11-Sep-14 02:36:29 EDT

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Russwurm Social is a microblogging service brought to you by Laurel L. Russwurm. It runs the StatusNet microblogging software, version 1.1.0-release, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Russwurm Social content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.